Moderator: Moderators

Auto_Man wrote:nickorider wrote:What about comments that werent advertising...but it has those words in it?
examples:
This track is sweet, featured and faved!
I beat this track on my 3rd try!
That's a good point. I think a moderation setup would be good, a track/comment has to be approved before it's added. We just haven't got enough people to do it.

nickorider wrote:Auto_Man wrote:nickorider wrote:What about comments that werent advertising...but it has those words in it?
examples:
This track is sweet, featured and faved!
I beat this track on my 3rd try!
That's a good point. I think a moderation setup would be good, a track/comment has to be approved before it's added. We just haven't got enough people to do it.
good idea


Gräggen wrote:It's not a good idea. Would you rather see a team approving comments before they're added, than a team approving tracks before they're added?
Prioritize what you spend resources on.


Gräggen wrote:It's not a good idea. Would you rather see a team approving comments before they're added, than a team approving tracks before they're added?
Prioritize what you spend resources on.



jammie(jamie)haligan wrote:what about "stolen" when my tracks arn't. the codes where ether given 2 me or i made them
or "cr.ap" or "rubbish". what about them.
![]()
![]()
![]()


jammie(jamie)haligan wrote:yeah some of my friends email them 2 me




I thought I could make a track bigger than Stone Mountain, now I'm paying the price.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests